Whenever government takes over an industry, regardless of which
country or which sector, shortages will soon follow. This is because the
free-market mechanism has been altered due to regulation, legislation,
nationalization, or perhaps due to antitrust laws. More often than not
we see this in socialized countries. We see it United States with
utilities, and other so-called "natural monopolies" also. In fact, we're
seeing it right now with ObamaCare. Although we haven't seen the
shortages yet, we will, there are already signs.
There have been a
number of mergers with health insurance companies, hospitals, HMOs, and
medical device companies as everyone readjusts to the future Affordable
Health Care Act. When there are shortages the price goes up, and when
the price goes up too much, the government will institute price
controls. One only has to look at the history of governments meddling in
business, industry and economies to see this is true.
Now then,
there was an interesting piece in the Wall Street Journal on August 13,
2013 titled; "Flood Insurance Prices Surge - Law Passed by Congress
Before Sandy Is Causing Sticker Shock - and a Backlash," by Siobhan
Hughes which noted that; "the $24 billion cumulative loss for the
National Flood Insurance Program.
The government says they have no
choice but to raise the price. Isn't that interesting? If it were left
to the private sector the price would eventually fall in line, and it
would be reality based. It would be based on risk, region, and the
potential for a real flood, overflowing river, early ice melt, tsunami,
storm surge, or what have you. Insurance companies are not stupid, they
do their homework. They use the same ERSI software that the GIS experts
working in government and their consultants use. They also use the same
map when it comes to probability and risk.
Okay so, perhaps you
can understand why I find it fascinating that the government is raising
prices when it provides the insurance, but wants to institute price
controls further exacerbating the challenges they've caused by
manipulating the free-market system when it comes to the Affordable
Health Care Act. If you ask me this is a bit of hypocrisy, but that's
how government does things. Recently the Kaiser foundation had done a
study about the increase in health care insurance plans, showing that
they have and will continue to increase. How can they not, I ask? And
Kaiser went mellow on the recent price increased and future estimated
costs (I believe underestimating it all by a factor of 30).
Still,
the government has told health insurance providers that they may not
charge more than 20% for the administration of their healthcare plans,
and they must spend at least 80% on actual medical services. Really? The
government usually spends 45% of whatever it gives out in
administration costs. Meanwhile the government tells the insurance
companies how to run their business, using approved methods, designed by
the same government which cannot possibly live with its own mandate of
only 20% administration costs.
Please consider all this on a philosophical, economic, and reality based level. That is all.
Post a Comment